<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s iPhone 3G: who needs carrier subsidies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.yankeegroup.com/2008/06/12/apples-iphone-3g-who-needs-carrier-subsidies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.yankeegroup.com/2008/06/12/apples-iphone-3g-who-needs-carrier-subsidies/</link>
	<description>the global connectivity experts™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:11:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.yankeegroup.com/2008/06/12/apples-iphone-3g-who-needs-carrier-subsidies/comment-page-1/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.yankeegroup.com/2008/06/12/apples-iphone-3g-who-needs-carrier-subsidies/#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis...finally someone looking at the facts...developing a logical conclusion...you know the old rule in electronics used to be 3 times parts cost for a rough rule of thumb as a minimum price...4 times parts cost is not unreasonable when you start buying in huge quantities and negotiate large blanket orders as you described...most of the articles I have read have either failed or glossed over the fact that the phone is selling to AT&amp;T and others at probably $400...$199.00 we see and the $200 upfront that Apple gets instead of the monthly fees...in my mind taking your summary a little further...this means that Apples revenue growth should accelerate...it would not surprise me to see Apple exceed $6.00 per share by a surprising amount in 2008...

Best Regards,
Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis&#8230;finally someone looking at the facts&#8230;developing a logical conclusion&#8230;you know the old rule in electronics used to be 3 times parts cost for a rough rule of thumb as a minimum price&#8230;4 times parts cost is not unreasonable when you start buying in huge quantities and negotiate large blanket orders as you described&#8230;most of the articles I have read have either failed or glossed over the fact that the phone is selling to AT&amp;T and others at probably $400&#8230;$199.00 we see and the $200 upfront that Apple gets instead of the monthly fees&#8230;in my mind taking your summary a little further&#8230;this means that Apples revenue growth should accelerate&#8230;it would not surprise me to see Apple exceed $6.00 per share by a surprising amount in 2008&#8230;</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petre motiu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.yankeegroup.com/2008/06/12/apples-iphone-3g-who-needs-carrier-subsidies/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>petre motiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.yankeegroup.com/2008/06/12/apples-iphone-3g-who-needs-carrier-subsidies/#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>great article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
